Plastic Surgery New Jersery

Image Plastic Surgery

 
Cosmetic Breast Surgery | Reconstructive Breast Surgery
 


Primary Aortoenteric Fistula

This rare condition is one of the most difficult diagnostic challenges for the clinician confronted with gastrointestinal bleeding. If endoscopy shows only minor abnormal findings that do not explain the magnitude of the bleed, this condition must be considered.

Martin J. Moskovitz, M.D., Department of Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center,
Brooklyn, NY

Byung-Hoon Kim, M.D., Staff, Department of Pathology, Lutheran Medical Center,
Brooklyn, NY

Joseph T. Vento, M.D., Staff, Department of Family Practice, Lutheran Medical Center,
Brooklyn, NY

Commentators:

Jeffrey P. Carpenter, M.D., Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA

Marvin L. Sachs, M.D., Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA

FEBRUARY 1994 • RESIDENT & STAFF PHYSICIAN

Primary aortoenteric fistula is a ighly lethal condition. A 1984 re-v noted that 189 cases of primary aortoenteric fistulization were re­ported in the world's literature,1 and several additional cases have since been reported.2-6 These reports de­scribe an entity that usually escapes ^mely detection despite a number of common presenting signs and symp­toms. The case report that follows •exemplifies many aspects of aor­toenteric fistula and will hopefully aid in the future diagnosis and treat­ment of this grave condition.

Case Report

A 75-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with a chief complaint of vomiting blood and having several bloody bowel movements. Her past medical histo­ry was significant for alcohol abuse, hypertension, two cerebrovascular accidents, peptic ulcer disease, and recent myocardial infarctions. Two months prior to this admission, the patient had experienced an upper gastrointestinal bleeding episode as­sociated with hypotension (80/40 mm Hg) and was admitted to the hospital. She was resuscitated with packed red blood cells and crystal­loid solution. Esophagogastroduo-denoscopy was deferred due to an acute myocardial infarction. She was placed on H2 blockers for a suspect­ed bleeding peptic ulcer and dis­charged after observation and treat­ment of her myocardial infarction.

Three weeks later, the patient was admitted to another hospital for re­current gastrointestinal bleeding. Diffuse gastritis was disclosed on esophagogastroduodenoscopy. A third minor bleeding episode oc­curred five days later during the same admission. Repeat endoscopy demonstrated diffuse gastritis and a lesser curvature ulcer. The electro­cardiogram showed changes consis­tent with acute subendocardial my­ocardial infarction. The patient was maintained on antiulcer medication and released following treatment of her cardiac condition.

She remained stable for two weeks at which time rebleeding ne­cessitated the present hospitaliza-tion. On admission to the family practice service, the patient was hemodynamically stable with a hematocrit of 26. She was given 3 U of packed red blood cells over the first two days of hospitalization. The patient underwent esopha­gogastroduodenoscopy on her third hospital day, which demonstrated multiple, small, nonbleeding, mu-cosal lesions suspicious for an-giodysplasia.

On the fourth hospital day, the patient was observed to have bright red blood draining from her naso-gastric tube, as well as copious melanotic stool. An emergency sur­gical consult was requested. The pa­tient was hemodynamically unsta­ble, with a loss of consciousness and a drop in blood pressure to 70/0 mm Hg. Physical exam revealed an un­conscious patient with palpable but thready pulses and no other remark­able findings. She was resuscitated with rapid infusion of 2 L of Ringer's lactate solution and 2 U packed red blood cells. Her blood pressure rose tolOO/50 mm Hg, and she regained consciousness. An-giography was considered, howev­er, the patient was deemed too un­stable to tolerate angiogram and was prepared for emergency laparotomy. Despite maximal resuscitative ef­forts, the patient's blood pressure continued to drop, and she went into electromechanical dissociation and died prior to laparotomy.

Autopsy examination disclosed a fistula between the distal third por­tion of the duodenum and the ab­dominal aorta 5 cm inferior to the re­nal arterial openings (Figure 1). The duodenal mucosa was marked by a 2-mm round hole with leaking blood evident (Figure 2). A probe could easily be passed from the aorta to the duodenum. The aorta was severely atherosclerotic with fusiform aneu-rysmal formation, recent and old thrombi, and focal dissection of the aneurysmal wall. Microscopic ex­amination of the aorta revealed extensive atherosclerosis with recent and old thrombi, focal dissection, and hemorrhage in the adjacent con­nective tissue toward the duodenal rent. The internal and external duo­denal muscle layers were markedly thin or absent. The mucosa and sub-mucosa showed chronic inflamma­tory changes, histiocytic reaction, degeneration, fibroblastic reaction, and focal perforation.

Other autopsy findings included severe coronary artery atherosclero­sis, old posterior and posterolateral myocardial infarctions, and multiple superficial gastric antrum erosions.

Discussion

Successful management of pri­mary aortoenteric fistula requires timely diagnosis and rapid treat­ment. As opposed to secondary aor­toenteric fistulas, which by defini­tion form following a prior abdominal operation (usually an aortic aneurysm repair), primary aortoenteric fistula arises de novo. • Presentation—The presentation of primary aortoenteric fistula has many typical aspects, although the "classic" triad of abdominal pain, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and a pulsatile abdominal mass is quite rare. In Sweeney's1 1983 review of 118 patients with primary aortoduo-denal fistula, 32% of patients com­plained of abdominal pain and less than 25% had a palpable abdominal mass. Bleeding (hematemesis +/-melena) was noted in 64% as an ini­tial symptom. Sweeney found shock to be a rare (< 5%) initial symptom and noted that in cases in which bleeding was the presenting symp­tom, over 70% of patients survived at least 6 hours from the time of hemorrhage until death or operative intervention. Likewise, Steffes7 re­ported that 50% of patients lived more than 24 hours between herald bleed and death, while 29% sur­vived over one week. Other report­ed signs of primary aortoduodenal fistula worth noting are gastroin­testinal bleeding with sudden hy­potension and syncope, as well as concurrent massive upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Etiology—The etiology of primary aortoduodenal fistula is unknown. One hypothesis postulates that aor­tic aneurysmal dilatation and pulsa­tion causes inflammation and necro­sis of adjacent bowel wall leading to fistulization.8 Aortic dilatation, however, is not a requisite. At least seven cases of primary aortoduode­nal fistula have been reported with no associated aneurysm." The com­mon pathologic feature in these cas­es was severe atherosclerotic dis­ease. The microscopic findings in this case report correlate well with the above hypothesis since they re­veal a long-standing pressure effect on the duodenal wall with atrophy of the muscular layers and perfora­tion at the site of maximal pressure.

The pathophysiology of the herald bleed is most likely due to the aforementioned fistulization and bleeding, which produces profound hypotension. The subsequent drop in aortic pressure decreases aortic wall tension and allows the forma­tion of a platelet plug and rudimen­tary fibrin deposition. With time, however, normalization of blood pressure and aortic pulsation invari­ably result in rebleeding.

• Diagnosis—The diagnosis of pri­mary aortoduodenal fistula relies primarily on a high index of suspi­cion since the time span from pre­sentation to death is relatively short and time spent on various tests is of­ten wasted. Based on current prac­tice, most stable patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding will under­go upper endoscopy. While this test is only marginally helpful in the di­agnosis of primary aortoduodenal fistula, it is indispensable in the identification of other far more common sources of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The major caveat of esophagogastroduodenoscopy is to correlate the findings with the pa­tient's signs, symptoms, and overall condition. Endoscopic reports often note gastritis, duodenitis, and an-giodysplasia. It is the responsibility of the attending physician to corre­late these findings with the clinical situation. In this case report, multi­ple endoscopic procedures dis­closed several abnormal findings, none of which, however, were like­ly to cause the massive bleeding that was seen. This type of error is widely apparent. Grigsby noted an esophagogastroduodenoscopy find­ing of a small nonbleeding varix of the gastroesophageal junction, which was treated with H2 Mockers.4 The patient died of primary aortoduo­denal fistula within one week. Similarly, Sweeney noted "antral gastritis,"1 Pritchett noted "duode­nal angiodysplasia, and both Perrott and Jaroch documented gastroe­sophageal tears.5'7 Finally, it is es­sential that the third and fourth por­tions of the duodenum be well visualized during esophagogastro­duodenoscopy because the majority of cases of primary aortoduodenal fistula occur at these sites.

The abdominal plain x-ray and up­per gastrointestinal series are of little help in diagnosing primary aortoduo­denal fistula, though a calcified aor­tic aneurysmal wall may hint at the diagnosis. Sonography will similarly alert the clinician to the presence of an aortic aneurysm, but it will not aid in the detection of fistulizafion.

Although arteriography would seem to be the most useful modality in diagnosing primary aortoduodenal fistula, it is only positive during active bleeding, a situation in which the patient is usually too unstable to undergo such an invasive procedure. The bleeding scan suffers a similar drawback because it requires both active bleeding and prolonged time under a detector.

Computerized tomography (CT) has been used in the evaluation of secondary aortoenteric fistulas with some success.9^" Reports have docu­mented intraluminal aortic gas, ex­travasation of contrast material, and generalized inflammation of the af­fected area, all leading to the diagno­sis of aortoenteric fistulization. Overall, the CT scan with intra­venous contrast appears to be the most useful current diagnostic modality. It can detect and assess an aortic aneurysm, as well as provide clues to enteric fistulization as mentioned above.

• Treatment—Primary aortoenteric fistulas are uniformly fatal if not treated. The treatment of choice is exploratory laparotomy, replace­ment of the diseased aortic segment with a prosthetic graft, and primary repair of the enteric defect. Cultures should be obtained to assess the need for antibiotic coverage, although such coverage is usually not needed. This is in contrast to sec­ondary aortoenteric fistulas, in which case antibiotic coverage and extra-anatomic bypass are routinely neces­sary due to a contaminated field.

Summary

Primary aortoenteric fistulas are the cause of severe, usually fatal, gastrointestinal bleeding. They are commonly associated with aortic aneurysms, which may otherwise be asymptomatic, and they are ex­tremely difficult to diagnose unless a high index of suspicion is maintained. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with visualization of the third and fourth portions of the duodenum can be helpful, howev­er, common findings such as an-giodysplasia or gastritis should not be easily accepted as the cause of this type of massive bleed. The en-doscopy must be correlated with the clinical picture. No patient should be discharged home on H2 blockers with a diagnosis of upper gastroin­testinal bleeding of unknown etiol­ogy until primary aortoenteric fistu­la is ruled out. Currently, the best diagnostic modality is CT scan with intravenous contrast. Primary aor­toenteric fistula is a highly fatal con­dition, but death can be prevented if the condition is suspected early and treated aggressively.

References

  1. Sweeney MS, Gadacz TR: Primary aortoduode-nal fistula: Manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment. Surgery 96:492-497, 1984.
  2. Yano H, Jimi A, et al: Primary aortoduodenal fistula: Report of an autopsy case. Caslroenlerol Jpn 22:218-221, 1987.
  3. Grigsby WS, Eitzen EM, Boyle DJ: Aortoenteric
  4. Jaroch MT, Diehl JT, Zippert AM: Primary aor-toduodenal fistula without abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cleve Clin Q 552:579-581, 1985.
  5. Gad A: Aortoduodenal fistula revisited. ScandJ Gastroenterol 24:97-100,1989.
  6. Perrott C: Aortoenteric fistula without aortic di­latation: A case report. J Emerg Med 7:349-351, 1989.
  7. Steffes BC, O'Leary JP: Primary aortoduodenal fistula: A case report and review of the literature. Am Surg 46:121-129,1980.
  8. Elliot JP, Smith RF, Szilagyi E: Aortoenteric and paraprosthetic fistulas. Arch Surg 108:479-488, 1984.
  9. Bower TC, Cherry KJ, Pairolero PC: Unusual manifestations of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surg Clin North Am (Aug)69(4):750-751, 1989.
  10. Ibrahim IM, Raccuia JS, Zafar A: Primary aor­toenteric fistula-diagnosis by computerized tomogra­phy. Arch Surg 124:870-871, 1989.
  11. Kokora JS, Rushton FW, Cranston PE: New computerized lomographic signs of aortoenteric fistu­la. ArchSurg 119:1073-1075, 1984.

The Authors

Martin J. Moskovitz, M.D
Dr. Moskovitz is in the Department of Surgery at Maimonides Medical Center in Brooklyn. After receiving his M.D. degree from Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Dr. Moskovitz completed a research fellowship at New York University Medical Center.

Byung-Hoon Kim, M.D.
Dr. Kim is Attending Pathologist at Lutheran Medical Center in Brooklyn, NY. After receiving his M.D. degree from Yonsei University Medical School, Korea, Dr. Kim completed his internship and residency in pathology at Staten Island Hospital and Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn.

Jk Joseph T. Vento, M.D.
Dr. Vento is on staff in the Department of Family Practice at Lutheran Medical Center and Victory Memorial Hospital, Brooklyn, NY. After receiving his M.D. degree from St. George's University, Dr. Vento completed his residency in family practice at Lutheran Medical Center.

 

Drs. Carpenter and Sachs Comment

The rarity of aortoenteric fistula and the relative frequency of other conditions producing the same clini­cal manifestations conspire to make this one of the most difficult diag­nostic and therapeutic challenges in clinical medicine and surgery. A successful outcome depends on recognition or strong suspicion of the condition and prompt surgical intervention, usually under circum­stances of critical illness and hemo-dynamic instability.

Aortoenteric fistulas are of two types, primary and secondary. Pri­mary fistulas, first described by Sir Astley Cooper in 1829,1 are direct communications between the native aorta and the enteric tract. They may be caused by aortic disease (aneurysm, atherosclerosis, infec­tion) or diseases of the bowel (ulcer, pseudocyst, infection, neoplasm). In an autopsy series of 10,000 consec­utive cases, only 7 primary aortoen­teric fistulas were detected.2 Sec­ondary aortoenteric fistulas between the aorta or an aortic prosthesis and the bowel following aortic recon­structive surgery are more com­mon. The first report of a secondary aortoenteric fistula appeared only one year after the first successful repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm.

While aortoenteric fistulas have been described in virtually every re­gion of the gastrointestinal tract, the most common location is the duode­num. The intimate association of the duodenum and the abdominal aorta suggests an erosive mechanism for primary fistulization. Infection, too, may play a role, as evidenced by the prevalence of bacteria cultured from the abdomen during operations to repair these fistulas.4 It is unclear, however, whether infection is the cause or the result.

Unfortunately, even the excellent diagnostic approach outlined by Moskovitz and colleagues in this re­port, which included gastrointestinal endoscopy, particularly esopha-gogastroduodenoscopy, CT scan­ning, and arteriography, produces a very low diagnostic yield. In pa­tients with a known or suspected ab­dominal aortic aneurysm and gas­trointestinal hemorrhage, prompt laparotomy indicated by a high in­dex of suspicion is essential as both a diagnostic and therapeutic step.

The first successful repair of a primary aortoenteric fistula was de­scribed by Heberer in 1957.5 It is necessary for the surgeon to obtain vascular control, eliminate the com­munication between the bowel and the aorta, and repair the enteric and vascular defects. The operation will need to be individualized, but several guiding surgical principles ap­ply. In the most common situation, a fistula to the duodenum, the rela­tive sterility of duodenal contents allows for standard aortic recon­struction in situ. In a review of 14 such primary fistulas, only one pa­tient died from a disruption of a proximal aortic anastomosis, and this was due to infection with gram-negative bacteria.6 The contamina­tion associated with primary aorto­duodenal fistula is usually limited and can be successfully eliminated by debridement of the region at the time of in situ graft placement. If, however, extensive contamination or sepsis should be encountered when managing a primary aortoen-teric fistula, in situ replacement of the aorta would be contraindicated, and extra-anatomical reconstruc­tion, such as axillobifemoral by­pass, should be employed with vas-cularized coverage of the aortic closure. Surgical management of secondary aortoenteric fistulas near­ly always requires extra-anatomical reconstruction.

Summary

It is hoped that, through height­ened awareness of aortoenteric fistula, early operative intervention may lead to a reduction in the high mortality associated with this condition. The key to suspecting the diagnosis is recognizing that the bleeding patient might have significant aortic disease.  

 

The Commentators

Jeffrey P. Carpenter, M.D.
Dr. Carpenter is in the Department of Surgery at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. After receiving his M.D. degree from Yale University School of Medicine, Dr. Carpenter completed his internship and residency in surgery at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, where he also completed a fellowship in vascular surgery.

Marvin L. Sachs, M.D.
Dr. Sachs is in the Department of Medicine at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia.

top

 

 

Facial Procedures Breast Procedures Procedures for the body Procedures for the skin Scarless Breast Reduction Tummy Tuck Assisted Pay Program!